|
ENERGY IDEAS · SPRING 1997 / WINTER 1996 · VOL. 4, NUMBER 3
ENERGY- SMART SCHOOLS
There is no doubt about it: many public schools are in bad physical shape. In a
1995 nationwide survey of schools conducted by the U.S. General Accounting
Office (U.S.GAO) titled School Facilities: Conditions of America's Schools,
nearly 50 percent of school officials reported at least one unsatisfactory
environmental condition - such as poor heating, lighting, ventilation or
air quality.
More than 40 percent gave their school an unsatisfactory energy-efficiency
rating. One school administrator reported, "Our school facilities are not
energy efficient or wired for modern technology. Our floor tile is worn out and
the furniture is in poor shape. Our taxpayers don't want to put any more
[money] in schools. Our teachers want better pay. Our students and parents want
more programs and technology. HELP!!!"
To make matters worse, many public school systems are in dire financial
condition with decreasing revenues and rising costs. Numerous school districts
are straining to provide a safe and comfortable learning environment, even as
schools defer maintenance and repair work due to limited budgets. The resulting
use of inefficient heating and cooling equipment and the deterioration of buildings
increases energy costs.
The irony is that the proficient operation of buildings and the installation
of energy-efficient equipment are two ways school districts can save money and fund other necessary
programs.
This edition of Energy Ideas tracks successful energy conservation
initiatives in schools at the elementary, secondary and collegiate levels. It
offers strategies for implementing an effective energy management program,
including:
- getting started: organizing energy data and developing a
comprehensive energy plan;
- the quick fix: saving energy with minor equipment and maintenance
changes;
- retrofits: saving money and improving student performance by
modernizing lighting systems and the building envelope;
- system conversions: maximizing energy savings with improved
heating and cooling systems;
- sustainable energy: installing cost-effective and reliable
solar, wind and geothermal technologies;
- transportation: limiting the need for vehicle use and promoting
alternatives to polluting buses and cars;
- environmental education: raising the environmental awareness of
tomorrow's energy consumers; and
- getting funded: securing financing for institutional
energy-efficiency and renewable energy improvements.
WHY BOTHER SAVING ENERGY?
Given competing interests for money, time and other resources, why should
schools bother to improve their energy management?
- IT SAVES MONEY. Simply put, the less money schools spend on energy,
the more they have for educating students. The total energy bill to run the
nation's schools nears $8 billion annually, according to a 1992 study,
Schoolhouse in the Red: Cutting Our Losses, conducted by the American
Association of School Administrators. Energy costs are projected to increase as
schools acquire more energy-consuming technologies such as computers, printers
and copiers and as maintenance costs continue to be deferred. Schoolhouse in
the Red reports that schools can save up to 25 percent, or $1.85 billion
per year, by implementing energy-efficiency measures. The federal government
gets four dollars in savings for every one dollar invested in energy
efficiency, according to the U.S. Department of Energy.
- IT INCREASES STUDENT AND STAFF PRODUCTIVITY. Students, teachers and
other staff can be made more comfortable, healthy and productive by improving
lighting, heating and cooling. Some schools have even reported lower rates of
absenteeism and vandalism by creating an atmosphere in which students can take
pride in their school.
In addition, research conducted by a student at Georgetown University found
that after removing variables such as socioeconomic status, achievement
scores of students in school buildings with "poor" conditions were over five
percentage points below the scores of students in buildings with "fair"
conditions, and 11 percentage points below those in schools with "excellent"
conditions. (M. Edwards, Building Conditions, Parental Involvement and
Student Achievement in DC Public Schools, 1991). Similarly, a study
conducted in North Carolina found that children in daylit schools score higher
on standard performance exams and have better attitudes and attendance rates
than their peers in nondaylit facilities. (See p.11).
- IT BUILDS COMMUNITY TIES. The Alliance to Save Energy claims that
energy-efficiency programs build strong communities by focusing local attention
on solving problems, and keeping dollars within the schools. (See p.23).
- IT EMPOWERS STUDENTS. Students are the energy consumers of tomorrow.
By educating them about the consequences of energy consumption, they can
play an important role in determining their energy future.
Further, as a building trades instructor in Oakland, California remembers, "My
first motivation for getting started was that too often students say, `I'm
never going to use this stuff when I graduate.' Energy management is relevant
once they start paying the bills." (CA Energy Extension Service, Bright
Ideas: A Total Resource Energy Management Guide for Schools, 1992).
UTILITY DEREGULATION: BOON OR BOONDOGGLE?
The advent of utility deregulation is redefining how energy is
purchased. Government agencies have an opportunity to use their enormous market
share to ensure low rates are complemented with increased efficiency and
renewable energy procurement.
Please let us know what strategies you are considering, or already
implementing, to deal with this new competitive market. We plan to tackle this
complex issue in our next edition. Thanks!
|